The Spanish government has a plan to prevent kids from watching porn online: Meet the porn passport.

Officially (and drily) called the Digital Wallet Beta (Cartera Digital Beta), the app Madrid unveiled on Monday would allow internet platforms to check whether a prospective smut-watcher is over 18. Porn-viewers will be asked to use the app to verify their age. Once verified, they’ll receive 30 generated “porn credits” with a one-month validity granting them access to adult content. Enthusiasts will be able to request extra credits.

You have to request more porn credits from the government if you need more? Don’t want the government to be tracking this data of you. This is a privacy issue

  • jabjoe@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    So teens learn about Tor & VPNs. This stuff doesn’t work. The higher you put the skills to get access, the more they will learn. Nothing motivates teens more than access to adult stuff. Maybe this is really a tech literacy policy.

  • doctortofu@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    It’s always porn, isn’t it? We don’t need to protect children from misinformation, fascism, violence, racism, discrimination or exploitation on the internet, it’s always just porn for some reason…

  • Emmie@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    At least it will raise tech literacy among youth. If it isn’t as easy and would require some thinking that’s already better than 99% of homework.

      • Emmie@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Even something as straightforward nowadays as VPN install can educate a person about cybersecurity as a side effect.

        Thing is most stuff is simply too easy too acquire nowadays. No effort. No thought. Just endless stream of dopamine that is too addicting to even bother inquiring about how the very thing you are using works.

        The victory of convenience will defeat us. There has to be some effort needed to acquire things otherwise they lose any value.

    • Syntha@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      Only applies to sites who are based in Spain, at least the porn bans in the US went somewhat scorched earth, this limp dicked attempt doesn’t even do that.

  • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    3 days ago

    Wait…I want to be “Secretario de Pornabilidad Social” or “Secretary or Social Probability”

    I imagine my self going through all the SSN… Sexual Super Numbers to manage access and report usage.

    1335346755 watched 6 hours per day of mostly vanilla doggy.

    2356544677 more doggie

    More doggie… doggie again. But every now and then… 1257678965534 watched 72 consecutive hours of BDSM where the sub faces downward into a hole in the floor where a camera…then the last does the same and the video cuts to another similar one. We must report this immediately to the right authority!

  • Frank Ring@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    3 days ago

    Porn is everywhere. It’s an endless battle.

    The internet should simply be 18+ only at this point.

    • repungnant_canary@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      I strongly disagree. The porn is a huge issue, but there are a lot of actually useful websites where kids and teens can learn about their interests. Gatekeeping all that knowledge would make young people significantly less knowledgeable

      • ocassionallyaduck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        Unironically: child safe websites should be under a separate DNS provider from your ISP, provided via a separate ISP router or modem. Setup a separate national level routing.

        Seriously. Kids get curated internet only, adults get the firehose.

        The idea of porn credits and voluntarily giving the government a list of everything you look at is utter insanity.

        • domdanial@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          While I also like the idea of a separate second “internet” I feel like this is just another ID check requirement. It would still be better than a porn token wallet I guess. Either there would be an identity tied to all traffic from an access point(still a privacy problem) , or the access points themselves would have to be like, kept away from children or something somehow. Parental locks?

          • ocassionallyaduck@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Make the children internet token based for kids, use a yubikey or something (no password to learn), and leave the regular internet as is. Make ISPs provide families with kids access to both, either via subnet or dedicated hardware.

            From there just have policy to not give the unrestricted network access to kids. Aka parenting. Public institutions like libraries can have most open terminals on the “safenet” and limited public access to the unfiltered net.

            For a “poor man’s version” of this concept, you could do a pi-hole sub-network for home use, but the internet elsewhere is still the internet.

            That’s one possible idea anyways, and a damn sight better than porn credits.

            • TheClockStruck13@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              LMAO, there’s a thing called a Firewall right, PiHole, get one, set it up at home, link the mobile devices through it for proxy or DNS…. Boom, your kids now can’t use the internet for porn or any other unscrupulous reason.

              • ocassionallyaduck@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                Yea, that’s what I was saying. But if you wanted a national level of this, having ISPs setup a “kid access” subnet that just runs on a separate Wifi SSID would make this idea easier for the non tech savvy.

      • ssj2marx@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        32
        ·
        3 days ago

        National IDs, require an ID to connect, limit the hours for kids. Works in South Korea and China - sure it can be gotten around but that takes a certain amount of effort that isn’t worth it for the majority of the population.

          • ssj2marx@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            23
            ·
            3 days ago

            Then enjoy all of the negative social outcomes of widespread internet addiction I guess.

              • ssj2marx@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                2 days ago

                Either unrestricted access to the internet hurts children, or it doesn’t. If it hurts children, then we have a societal responsibility to protect them from it. “Good parenting” wouldn’t be able to protect kids from lead in the paint, so why would we expect it to protect them from other widespread harmful contagions?

              • ssj2marx@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                2 days ago

                I didn’t say track, I said control access. I know my fellow Americans tend to bristle at the idea of doing anything for the common good, but I personally feel that the danger of unregulated media and internet access has been well demonstrated in the past hundred years, and that not regulating it in some capacity is just as negligent as not regulating firearm ownership or toxins in the food.

    • kylian0087@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      So school shut be 18+ as well then? The best teacher is the Internet for just about anything. If it is info about how to garden or how to setup networking gear. The internet has it.

  • rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    3 days ago

    Hola señores, necesito más créditos de la pornografía porque sus madres tienen tetas grandes.

  • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    179
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Politicians keep trying to helicopter parent the entire populations of countries.

    Making sure your kids don’t go places online before they should, and have conversations with them about it once they reach an age where it happening is inevitable, is something every, single, parent, should do.

    Not the fucking state.

    And this has to be one the weirdest implementations of porn surveillance I’ve ever seen.

    • RedStrawberry@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      93
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Exactly! Government granted ‘porn credits’ sounds absolutly insane as a serious idea…

      Porn “Enthusiasts will be able to request extra credits” is one wild sentence.

      A porn “enthusiast”, requesting the government for porn credits, to watch porn? What?

    • Souyo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      In my experience most parents are to lazy to keep up with setting appropriate restrictions for kids and like some parents, they expect someone else to raise and take care of their children.

      • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        4 days ago

        So what? I’ve had the exact same experience.

        It’s not a reason for the state to overstep into ALL our lives. In fact, the state stepping in is giving such parents yet more excuses to put even less effort into shaping the adults that their children will become.

      • youmaynotknow@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        4 days ago

        That’s their problem. I’ll handle my kids, fuck the government and fuck those useless parents as well. They should not have had kids.

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          …fuck those useless parents as well. They should not have had kids.

          But that’s how the problem started in the first place!

  • Chaotic Entropy@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    It will be fun for one unashamed porn addicted user to keep making so many requests to this service that they break it.

    “Javier, it’s been 30 minutes since your last credit application.”

    “MORE CREDITS. CAN’T TALK.”

  • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Kids can torrent my dude. Been doing it since I was like 13, and that’s only because before that I was using limewire, then frostwire, then bearshare, then I found torrents because TPB took over. I’ve been pirating since I was like 9.

    That is to say: This dumb ass bullshit isn’t even going to work.

    • Crikeste@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      3 days ago

      I come from a state that has officially mandated that porn websites must verify your age to use them for years. There were many websites that just didn’t give a fuck. X videos in particular. They do now require you to hit a button saying “I’m 18” to process, but I think my point stands.

      These laws do nothing, really.

      • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        3 days ago

        The “I’m 18/21” button on websites has been around since I was a kid in the 90s, used to have to input the “actual” date too so I was born 01/01/1970 according to a lot of now defunct porn sites lol. Also still in use on tobacco, vape, alcohol, and gun websites as well.

        But yeah as I am am example of, lying is always possible lol. I guess this passport or the ID thing in some states is supposed to hinder that, but torrent sites throw a wrench into any censorship efforts and they’re already illegal, they won’t play ball with the ID bullshit, ever.

    • mihor@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Please, I’ve been pirating on C64 before I even got the concept of pirating.

      • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Oohhh someone was born earlier and that makes them the coolest guy ever! “Please” lol.

        Jerk-off motion/eye-roll combo.

        • mihor@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Umm, didn’t mean to deride you, sorry that I wasn’t clear enough about that, I should’ve been more precise. What I meant to say was that I was pirating before I knew what pirating even meant. I was not old enough at the time and it was in the good old times of C64 when people weren’t generally aware of piracy.

          • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            The “please” at the beginning of a statement (not a question) like that is typically used to patronize or condescend, usually only used when being hostile or dismissive. If English isn’t your first language I can understand the misunderstanding.

  • golden_zealot@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    117
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Wow good job Spain.

    I guess this works because email doesn’t exist.

    I guess this works because file sharing applications and websites don’t exist.

    I guess this works because VPN’s free and paid don’t exist.

    I guess this works because Tor, i2p, Freenet, and Yggdrasil don’t exist.

    I guess this works because torrenting doesn’t exist.

    I guess this works because black markets don’t exist.

    I guess this works because chat applications don’t exist.

    To be a fly on the wall of these government meetings where they talk about this shit would surely be the funniest fucking thing in the world.

    • themurphy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      4 days ago

      You are right, it’s really stupid.

      But it’s also stupid not to consider, that it’s not the real reason they made this in the first place.

      They want to track you, and porn is the first excuse. If this is a success you might need this passport for alot of other things.

      • pdxfed@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        3 days ago

        Thank you for contributing!

        You’ve used the last of your political observation credits for the month. If you’d like to request more, please visit yourcountry.gov citizen portal and fill out the application. Your wait time will be 3-5 business days. We apologize for the wait but we are currently receiving a high volume of applications.

        -govbot

    • VirtualOdour@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      4 days ago

      I want to be at the meeting a year from now where they realize only two people have ever signed up ‘Yay we fixed porn!’

      Buy who am I kidding they brought VPN shares before this was introduced

      • No_Eponym@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 days ago

        Bought VPN shares and water shipping company shares because they know wasting money on this shit instead of on public infrastructure to provide more reliable clean water is only good for commercial interests.

    • uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      3 days ago

      No one wants to tell the government they’re watching porn, especially in a Catholic country like Spain.

      It’s intended to reduce porn use, often to fuel conservative hate-driven ideology movements. Sexually frustrated people are more eager to endorse violence against marginalized groups.

      It’s pure sociological manipulation.

      • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Sexually frustrated people are more eager to endorse violence against marginalized groups.

        Aren’t they more likely to endorse violence against the politicians enacting these dumb laws in the first place?

        • uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          Sure. Which is why autocrats turn to fascism (that is a mythical history of an in-group and out-groups) to redirect that outrage against other races, other ethnicities, other religions, women, LGBT+, countercultures, teenagers, immigrants, etc. And it works because the naked ape is already frustrated with society being too big (hundreds of thousands rather than dozens), and is always looking for common traits among bad drivers and untidy neighbors.

          And it works every time, since it takes effort to be rational and practice tolerance. Mostly the lumpenproletariat (simple folks who are not politically savvy) are the driving force behind hate campaigns, but the rest of us start wondering if so many people are negging on the Jews, maybe there’s a point. And rumors like blood libel and groomers helps those feelings along. 24-hour propaganda on FOX News and OAN helps too.

      • SuddenDownpour@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 days ago

        The ruling party in Spain is socially progressive, so they’re shooting themselves on the foot with this one.

        No one wants to tell the government they’re watching porn, especially in a Catholic country like Spain.

        Spain is majority Catholic, but in terms of people having mostly secular lives, it’s very similar to France. If anything, religion has more weight in institutions in relation to its social significance than it should as a leftover from our fascist dictatorship from 50 years ago.