The draw-back with sodium batteries needs to be known, because they won’t replace lithium anytime soon.
The density is lower, which is a great problem in EVs.
Not trying to be negative, but for an EV, or anything handheld, you get more weight for less power. Which is essential in a car, that uses more power the heavier it is.
What sodium IS the best at, are use cases where weight and size doesn’t matter. Like with battery farms.
In this case they are much better than lithium.
Batteries can’t stabilise frequency. If the frequency changes too much, the grid will go down.
You literally need a giant spinning turbine for this.
It’s pretty basic energy engineering, and is not related to load balancing.
While controversial, I think it’s more a product of how insane US “politics” are.
They could be good guys even so.
My best guess would be that Shopify either care about the open Web or had some disagreements with Google.
I can’t find anything shady on them, but maybe I’m looking the wrong places.
You do. They can only collect data you allow.
Are you familiar with the Danish system tho?
We have this in Denmark, and when it works, you’ll all love it.
It’s soooo easy to use, and it’s also a very secure way it’s implemented, because we have 2FA for everything important.
falls short later
So far… Next model will be even better, and it won’t stop getting better.
Fair, then everything I can find on the Internet must be freeware too. Set the sails, matey!
The malware thing still deserves a headline. They just argue it’s stupid so many even have to use the library to begin with.
Great take.
So they did it, but purposely didn’t do it well enough. Next time it’s a 10% fine.
I actually agree with you, that Apple most certainly will stall. And I also don’t think it’s optimal, but huge decisions on how to go forward do take time.
And I just think it may be better in the long run, that it seems more “fair” for the company, even thought it’s not.
Also, if Apple doesn’t comply this time and tries to find a new bullshit form of non-compliance, there’s no second chance according to the EU law. The fine will hit, so they certainly won’t do that.
Yeah, they will, but I think for this to work and be respected, they need to give companies this period, because it actually could take alot of time to change.
In this case, not so much, but it could be in the future, and the rules are the same regardless.
At least it opens up for challenge.
Well, if it’s illegal to do otherwise, some must do it, because the money involved are big.
Who cares.
If Apple don’t want to compete fair in the market, then others will.
And no iPhone user will miss an AI feature. Most of them don’t even understand how to use 80% of the phones features anyway.
5 people could do it though.
Yeah, seems weird, but there’s also points where it’s not related at all.
One is a company using user data they didn’t tell they would use for this purpose, and illegally trying to do it anyway. They literally sell the data by making a product of it. It’s also a private company with stakeholders.
Other is EU scanning messages, but not selling them.
So it’s about who you trust basically.
Might be a 10thDentist take, but I could be surprised.
It’s reliable in specific use cases, I’ll give it that.
Sodium batteries will not replace lithium in cars, as the density is too low.
It means the battery weighs more but contains less power.
For an EV, that wouldn’t work, as the heavier the car is, the more power it uses.
With sodium you will probably half the range of the EV, which is already low.