Maybe they didn’t want to tarnish the copilot brand with risky privacy invasion
Maybe they didn’t want to tarnish the copilot brand with risky privacy invasion
Why would that be possible? Wouldn’t the developer have their server rejected any calls from “unsigned” apps?
Did those using tutor AI spend less time on learning? That would have been worth measuring
This is probably makes a good case for open sourcing all governing algorithms
Very true because the relationship they have with laptop manufacturers will ensure windows domination
You’re right, there’s no point in general public following these news. When a lab publishes such, it’s meant for other researchers. The other researchers can try to build upon. It might become useful or as an inventor put it - discover a thousand ways of how not to do it.
When you see big numbers reported but see the deployed improvements in single digits, that’s coz the big number improvement gets deployed many years later.
They used pressurised water reactors with enriched uranium. Dunno how the costs run but there is no strategic alternative anyway. They also wouldn’t want such highly enriched uranium to be commonplace.
Yep, they are not portable, every app should come bundled with its own interpreter. As to why, I think historically it didn’t target production grade application development.