At the bottom of the list was Chinese company BYD, which scored a dire 11/90. German company Mercedes-Benz scored highest with 51/90.
There’s a reason those cheap evs everyone is always clamoring over are so cheap.
At the bottom of the list was Chinese company BYD, which scored a dire 11/90. German company Mercedes-Benz scored highest with 51/90.
There’s a reason those cheap evs everyone is always clamoring over are so cheap.
There’s some sampling bias at play because you don’t hear about the less flashy examples. I use machine learning for particle physics, but there’s no marketing nor outrage about it.
Almost as if it’s artificial.
Sure, but people seem to buy into that very buzz wordyness and ignore the usefulness of the technology as a whole because “ai bad.”
I’ll scratch it or lose it, and if I don’t, I’ll have a pile of plastic crap I don’t want. I’m not really worried about digital media being taken away, and I could find it again if need be.
I mean, I don’t want to either. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Ya, but they were gonna make me buy a subscription for a mouse!
It’s a shame they went under during the rise of the maker movement. What an asset they could have been. I remember they started carrying arduino near the end and thought somebody must have tried to reach for their roots. Too little, too late.
Fuck braille bro
I got fiber in the middle of nowhere from it. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
JLAB has deer, not horses … anymore.
Source: Implement trained cnn and gnn models in hardware for real-time particle identification and tracking for high-energy physics.
You just don’t know what it is beyond memes.
“Burn it off to train AI” is a silly thing to consider given how much computing occurs just to even argue about this.
People in this thread think AI is just the funny screenshot they saw on social media and concluded that they are smart and AI is dumb.
That is not a reasonable assertion at all. AI is being used in more ways than what is being described in your rage-bait media diet. “AI is pointless and it sucks” is a blatantly ignorant statement.
You’re right. People just see pop articles about a small aspect of a much wider range of technology in its infancy and fire off hot takes. Other aspects are revolutionizing data processing in physics, for example, but you have to dig a little deeper than a snide rage-bait article for that.
9/10 should have been written in comic sans.