It’s only theft as long as you cling to the failed “copyright” model.

Big tech couldn’t steal anything if we don’t respect their property rights in the first place.

By reifying copyright under the AI paradigm, we maintain big tech’s power over us.

The truth is chatgpt belong to us. ClosedAI is just the compiler of the data.

If we finally end the failed experiment of copyright, we destroy their mote.

I’m sorry but that’s what illness means. It is not an identity.

Yes, it’s streamer making a copy. You’re fine. Sharing is caring. Copyright is a mental illness.

Copyright infrigment is not theft, training models is not copyright infringement either. We need a law equivalent to when an artist says “he’s inpired by someone else” . That it specifically is illegal to do that without permission if you use a machine. That will force big tech to pay a pittance for it and it will instakill all the small player.

I found the following It migth be possible and affordable

https://konfuzio.com/en/tesseract/

https://github.com/Matleo/Tesseract_fine_tuning_training

https://groups.google.com/g/tesseract-ocr/c/ZLOZpW1fD6I/m/B1Ponc0VBAAJ

https://arcruz0.github.io/posts/finetuning-tess/

Can you fine tune tesseract on a local hand writing dataset ? Or insert it in context like a pre-prompt ?

If it’s on the internet, I save, I pirate, I protect. Don’t like it ? Then get off MY internet !

783056 good bye ICQ

Next CIA satellite over my house, I will legally shoot down with mu pulse laser !

It could be that microsoft was just the bootloader to closedAI

Shut down twitter!

Codestral : please reverse machine code of game crysis, setup the build environement then add campaign coop mode on the style of dying light and black ops 3. Make sure co-op is joinable from the very beginning.

Surely they’re not going to give the game away on the first generation ?

To end the PC and turn it into a phone. Surely they would let people run linux for gen 1 & gen 2 and only then lock the bootloader. And maybe keep a triple priced version with an unlockable bootloader until the alternative OS community dies of attrition.

Google should have thought of that before trying to paywall the zeitgeist.

If there’s a bouncer holding culture hostage, I’m going to sneak in the backdoor.

Make all single player games, campaign coop offline lan games.

You are correct. Nearly all youtube channels can be fully served off a single laptop. 260 concurrent streams at 1080p 3mbps is achievable over gigabit ethernet. Very few channels exceed this for any appreciable amount of time. And in those cases we can leverage a very small amount of the client’s ressources to further propagate the stream. This can be done with repurposed bittorrent dht. Now all we need is federated RSS and a locally running content curation algorithm and a social review system (like buttons and reputation history)

We solved this problem BEFORE youtube was even a thing. Youtube only exists out of convenience for normies. Youtube can die tomorrow, we will still have unlimited video. In fact, think youtube slowed down innovation on this front. Torrent trackers are unchanged in their form from 2003. I wouldn’t mind federated content, browser integration of torrent systems and locally running content recommendation system as well as social crowdsourced review systems (aka the like button and comments)

The main limitation is the 1 gigabit network. It can push out 260 3megabit streams or 50 15megabit streams at the most.

That’s already an enormous amount of concurrent viewers that covers 99% of content on youtube.

To achieve this, you can’t be wasting processing power anywhere, a straight copy to network from pre encoded files, no live transcoding.

No scripting, no encryption either. If you really need that, which you almost certainly don’t, then install a recerse proxy on your openwrt router.

Now, if you want to scale, which almost no video really needs, then you’ll send the client a script. The client is a source of inifinite scaling, compute and bandwidth.

Each client just needs to rebroadcast two streams of the file.

As excess clients connect, you tell them to get the stream from the stun/turn server. This punches through both sides of the nat. And puts two clients in communication. First client sends its copies of the received stream chunks, with preference from the beginning of the file. One client can get the stream from multiple other client and once it has a few stream chunks in the cache it can serve them to new clients.

It doesn’t take many doublings before you have more bandwidth than the whole internet. All the logic for organisation, hash checking, stream block ordering etc etc is a small text file from the server, signed by the server’s certificate. It runs entirely inside the client’s browser.

There is nothing like owning your own home. Spatially separated from the next one

Sure the ecofash commieblock enthusiasts downvoted me because they would prefer us all living in austere and efficient concrete pods so we emit less carbon as they pay us subsistence wages.

And I really wish we could swap homes on a whim and really be home anywhere instead of this musical chair bullshit.

Wow no thanks, I will decide if and when I replace the roof of my house and who will do it and how. I would really fucking hate the condominium approach of making that a collective decision. That’s why I want nothing other than detached homes, in the forest sepatated by 300-400 meter to the next one !