Its all vibes and manipulation
Its all vibes and manipulation
I think it should be: “Software that is yours”
Overall, I think more focus should be put on consolidating similar projects.
Do we really need 6 different window managers that follow the same design logic?
Do we really need each major distro to have its own package manager?
How many image and PDF viewers do we need? How many music players?
Can we convince Ubuntu that no one wants snaps and they are wasting developer resources.
The freed up capacity should be focused on better windows app compatibility. Something akin to Valve’s push in gaming.
Intel started running into trouble 15 years ago when they appointed CFO leadership as CEOs. They eroded 20 years of engineering leadership for the sake of “stakeholder value”. They also destroyed the company culture that made them successful and replaced it with MBA corporate BS.
You can’t rebuild that overnight. You basically need to start over.
Or they are gearing up to sell, so they pull this stunt to make their subscription numbers look better, before the cancellations start rolling in.
For me the main difference is Linux only does something when I ask it to.
Windows does whatever Microsoft wants it to do.
Both have major usability issues. But Linux gets a higher tolerance level, because of higher trust levels.
The problem is the bulk of it is going to Nvidia.
Line that is straight in two dimensions.
I believe so. Have not checked recently. All my Firefox extentions work as expected
I mostly use waterfox, which is very similar to librefox. I just like the more compacted UI and performance optimization they have done.
Your own raspberry pi will probably outperform your ISPs DNS, since it’s on your local network.
Also, just by blocking what it does, pages load a lot less, so they load a lot quicker.
“And then Mozilla management comes in from the top rope with the chair”
Seriously, for profit companies should not own open source projects.
Market shows that the market buys into hype, not value.
You can blame his leadership who did not authorise the additional time and cost for sandbox testing.
That’s because cloudstrike likely has significantly worse leadership compared to your company.
They have a massive business development budget though.
It’s likely not an intern’s fault. Likely a C suite not authorizing the testing infrastructures requested by the developers and sysops people.
It’s outside the primary failure domain.
Because the windows OS is inherently insecure with lots of permission elevation opportunities.
We also backup our bitlocker keys with our RMM solution for this very reason.
Valve is an excellent example of a sustainable tech company. It’s not on the growth at any cost, boom and bust cycle
I don’t have much of a problem with the small open source projects that are generally very good at filling gaps or addressing niches.
I think most of the waste is coming for the development done by the large open source houses. The canonical and red hats of the world. They should stick to what they are doing well, which is the foundational stuff.