This would be a great point if we were discussing how fast you can get the item and not the cost of the item.
This would be a great point if we were discussing how fast you can get the item and not the cost of the item.
Definitely would have been my first choice to look also, but do you think that staples or office max is going to have something cheaper than amazon?
There is a kernel of truth in that sentiment though. The government has a tendency to be grossly wasteful of resources, but I feel this is offset by the fact that they aren’t profit driven in their goals and less likely to skyrocket prices to line shareholder pockets. Corporation are also “wasteful” in a sense, where they charge insane markups over actual cost and refuse to pay taxes on them, the difference here is that corporations move their profits offshore and out of Americans pockets, where the government always ends up paying private contractors more than they should. In the end corporations do more with less while government controlled services are always WAAAAAY cheaper than their private counterparts for the consumer despite them being inefficient.
This is the part they don’t get. Do you want zero waste and ever rising prices for the sake of some worthless rent seeking billionaire cocksucker, or do u want some inefficiency, but you pay less overall. One makes someone else rich at your expense, the other allows you an affordable life while preventing another billionaire from existing.
Exploitation is the answer.
I typed hunt and peck for so long that I can hunt and peck with my eyes closed. Though technically I’m not hunting anymore, just pecking lol.
Shame the article was talking about a mobile phone or that point would have mattered…
90% of the time they are “carbon free” through carbon offsets, which are generally a huge amount of bs.
I’m pro social programs, I just spoke poorly. “Socialism for me but not for thee” was what I should have said
Our tax money when they inevitably screw a whole market over. So socialism
Edit: you all think I’m shitting on socialism, when I guess I was failing to tie together how capitalists will enjoy socializing their loses, but never socializing benefits to society.
So you are arguing its a duopoly?