Gee Louis, that reminds me of the time I lost my job after watching Family Guy for 48 hours straight
Gee Louis, that reminds me of the time I lost my job after watching Family Guy for 48 hours straight
There was also a deleted verse where Judas shouted “IT WAS A PRANK BRO” to Jesus after he came back from the dead.
https://cuelang.org/. I deal with a lot of k8s at work, and I’ve grown to hate YAML for complex configuration. The extra guardrails that Cue provides are hugely helpful for large projects.
It all makes sense now. Spiderman 2 was an Italian conspiracy to stop anon from jerking off.
Just steal one. As long as you hide it well, they’ll never catch you.
You’re right, my bad
Bro’s whole world was shattered when he discovered Marika is trans
I can’t think of any possible problem with this. It’s flawless. Kudos to anon for discovering such a bulletproof plan.
If it’s a publicly-accessible repo, then immediately revoke the key and leave it. Force-pushing isn’t good enough because the old commit will still be tracked by Git until the garbage collector kicks in, and you don’t have control over the GC on GitHub (not sure about other providers).
If it’s an internal repo that’s only accessible by employees, then you probably should still revoke it, but you’ve got more leeway. Usually I’d create a ticket to revoke it when there’s time, unless this is particularly sensitive.
Please tell me the replies roasted the shit out of him
It depends on the role. My first job was doing manual QE on Windows, and knowing Linux wasn’t much help at the time, but it did help me transition to a coding role in the same company a year later. I’m now doing platform engineering at a major tech company, but that has a high barrier to entry, which I suspect is the case for most roles that are Linux-focused. If you’re trying to get your foot in the door, I think you should look at job profiles for low barrier to entry roles (e.g. tech support) and try to work your way up.
In the US, some employers do pay out vacation, but many don’t, because there’s no law requiring them to do so. It’s perfectly legal to offer literally zero vacation days.
Probably because the individual engineers working on Takeout care about doing a good job, even though the higher-ups would prefer something half-assed. I work for a major tech company and I’ve been in that same situation before, e.g. when I was working on GDPR compliance. I read the GDPR and tried hard to comply with the spirit of the law, but it was abundantly clear everyone above me hadn’t read it and only cared about doing the bare minimum.
There’s no financial incentive for them to make is easy to leave Google. Takeout only exists to comply with regulations (e.g. digital markets act), and as usual, they’re doing the bare minimum to not get sued.
Can’t divide by zero, so it’s undefined. They exist in a quantum superposition of being a chad and a virgin