![](https://no.lastname.nz/pictrs/image/67f3b257-edb8-4a2b-aeb6-2710d708626e.jpeg)
![](https://fry.gs/pictrs/image/c6832070-8625-4688-b9e5-5d519541e092.png)
I like it, lots
I like it, lots
come on, clicked through and auto logged in to slashdot…
but my last comment was (oh shit) 17 years ago
I have 3 *BSD vms on proxmox, OpnSense and TrueNAS as well as a GhostBSD desktop for ‘play’. The TrueNAS started as a bare metal install and is now in it’d 3rd 4th server
I also have 2 Macs in the house…
So I guess *BSD is well represented here, looking forward to the read
Yeah it would be nice to have other platforms intel integrated graphics and Macs would be nice
i’ve seen it here as well, just not very often
Um lemmy exposes it as well, at least for admins
Well it works well enough for my small instance, so a thimbs up from here.
I’ll also point out that it was easy to configure and chang for my needs
https://github.com/ubergeek77/Lemmy-Easy-Deploy used to work well, not sure if it is maintained still @ubergeek77@lemmy.ubergeek77.chat ?
I remember them from back in the early 00s
thanks, there was nothing about a licence with the original post that i saw
What licence are they using? Do you know something everyone else does not?
Just because Llama Group want to control what goes into FreeLlama? Just like every other open source with a leadership?
Winamp will remain the owner of the software and will decide on the innovations made in the official version
If I release project qwtop as open source I still retain ownership of my code and make the decisions about what makes it into the main release; how is this different so far, when we haven’t seen the licence?
<edit: see post below>
The fact that there isnt one is useed as proof of a flat earth, I wonder what they will come up with when this goes in?
I’m not that old of a linux user, I think Slack may have been the second distro that I tried in probably 2000 after starting on Mandrake
well the “new desktop edit mode” was refining the user experience and fixing bugs