It’s only a crime if YOU do it citizen.
Corporate law breaking is just a cost of business.
Now stay in line peon.
It’s only a crime if YOU do it citizen.
Corporate law breaking is just a cost of business.
Now stay in line peon.
As an asshole that deserves the highest price hahahaha
Gotta pay the bills somehow, and I’m just happy they care about privacy.
Someone is running a smear campaign on Firefox, and I don’t know why.
The tech doesn’t track you, it’s very clear on that but the misinformation about it keeps popping up everywhere.
I’m very sorry that your life feels so out of control that you need to lash out so quickly with condescension.
Did you want to talk? Or perhaps explain where you think I misunderstand?
And if you “device type” that…. You’ll see a router likely.
Yes.
And they would ask “why is there a router on your network”
Probably just MAC address lookups, but also possibly something weird like “ttl “ stats
It’s a rarity afaik, I’ve only heard of one or two cases, but a concerning report to me personally.
Though I’m Canadian so it’ll be a few years before it filters here (assuming it catches on)
Yeah, they can still tell that you’re Nat behind another router.
But they don’t like it because it gives them less access to your network and more possibility for something to be wrong
Some isp’s have been detecting the second router and giving people shit for it.
But I’m with you on that, I don’t trust the isp’s backdoored router-modem. Hard pass.
Perhaps “willing to pay for taxi”?
Or “my DD friend is getting me and he owes me a favour?”
I always give “companyname@personaldomain.com”
That way datasets are harder to correlate and I know who leaked 😝
You don’t get to being the CEO of a large company without being an asshole of one type or another, and outrage drives views and clicks.
Soooo…. You get what you incentivise.
I didn’t say great, just “has more than one redeeming quality”
I’m very aware of the Facebook shit list, that’s why I’m so shocked.
As a user, and great fan of the llama models….
I did not have “Zuckerberg saves us from ai” on my bingo card.
…… nor did I have “musk threatens and then pussies out from fighting Zuckerberg”
Or even “Zuckerberg becomes less despised as an individual”
Like…… have I switched timelines and universes?
Search engines are rapidly becoming a thing of the past.
Google decided a few years ago that quality doesn’t matter (and they’re right, the monopoly they have means that their quality doesn’t matter for a good long while) but over the long term that’s sitting themselves in the foot.
This is just phase 2, installing fences around your market.
Phase 2 is often legal, so I’m waiting for some patent battles or something like that too, but the effect is the same.
With physical access to the device and encryption chips, you basically can’t defend against those kinds of resources.
Fair, charged is the wrong word.
But please explain how you see the fiduciary duty then?
90% angry nerds fighting each other over what answer is “right”