The theory is simple: instead of buying a household item or a piece of clothing or some equipment you might use once or twice, you take it out and return it.

  • john89@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    The problem is that you’re renting access to something you’re not actually consuming.

    Once you stop paying, you lose access and have nothing to show for it. They still have your money, though.

    This is different than, say, paying for electricity which is consumed and no longer available for either party after consumption.

    Sorry bud, you’re defending being scammed.

    Plus a large part of the article is about non-profit libraries anyway.

    Nice talking point just to cover your bum from shilling.

    • turmacar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      This isn’t new, everything has it’s place.

      We rented a trench digger for the day from Home Depot in the 90s instead of buying one for thousands of dollars. That trench didn’t magically go away when we returned the tool. That we didn’t have access to the tool anymore was the plan.

      Renting a U-haul for a move is incredibly more efficient than daily driving a giant box truck. Somehow, the things stay moved once the truck is returned.