• Zachariah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      20 days ago

      Signal being an American company is also problematic.

      These two are the best balance of security/convenience, however.

          • breadcat@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            20 days ago

            if a messenger is truly 0 trust end to end encryption, it doesn’t matter who owns the servers or the legal protections of data because they won’t have any data anyway. that’s why signal is so good, when they get subpoenaed the only information that they actually have is the last connection and message sent unix times or something. still secure regardless of being in the US and being run on centralized Amazon, google, and cloudflare servers.

            • Zachariah@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              20 days ago

              Then the jurisdiction of software development matters. Don’t want a back door being forced into an update by the FBI.

              • ᗪᗩᗰᑎ@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                19 days ago

                The FBI can’t just force them to add malicious code. A bad actor could try to contribute bad code, but Signal’s devs would likely catch it.