• antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    20 hours ago

    I’m worrying that whatever gets sold (Chrome or Android) might end up in the hands of someone even more scummy than Google.

    • theneverfox@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      They would have to be more scummy and also at least similarly competent… Google can’t innovate for crap, but they’re pretty good at maintaining projects (when they don’t randomly kill them off)

      If they stop work on chromium, or belief in the stewardship of chromium wanes, it’ll fragment the ecosystem again. Which is sorely needed at this point - we need to get back to standards and away from centralized control

      Imagine Twitter/musk acquires them. Microsoft, Apple, and many other big companies directly or indirectly rely on a chain now controlled by a group known for mismanagement - are they going to wait and see, or are they going to diversify?

      • antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Chiquita and Nestlé come to mind. Within tech industry, I’d say Amazon and probably Microsoft are worse as well, and there’s probably a ton of potentially even worse companies lurking in the shadows outside the top of the economic food chain.

      • VoterFrog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        I don’t know man. There’s a lot shittier business practices out there than paying to be the default search engine - which is laughably easy to change on any browser. Like marketplaces and services that pay to be exclusive sources of content and then use the fact that they’re the only source for most content to force extortionate deals on content creators and enshitify every aspect of the end user experience. Just to name one.