Oh, you’re saying that Recall is a privacy nightmare and a sweet target for malware? Surprised_pikachu.jpg

  • yemmly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    87
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    This has already been happening on the Web for quite some time. For example Microsoft Clarity records everything you do on those dodgy Web sites you visit. And they assign a universal identifier to you that can be correlated with the IDs Google and your device have already created and broadcast to profile you.

    And you think “oh but I use x, y, and z to prevent tracking”. Guess what: They make your browser do nonsense tasks in the background to benchmark your hardware and then assign a UUID to you based on that.

    The only thing that can help this situation is privacy legislation with real teeth.

    • ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      47
      ·
      5 months ago

      This is far far worse of a potential risk than a tracking identifier. Bank passwords, balances, social media pages, full text chat Windows, everything you ever view all OCRed and put in a neat searchable database for a hacker.

      • yemmly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        5 months ago

        My main point is that “observability” tools like Clarity are screen grabbing whole Web sessions and have been for some time.

        • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          34
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          But Clarity is an app a web developer adds to their own web site. So, yeah a website you visit sees everything you do on their website.

          That’s not new.

          Screen capping everything on your PC at all times is new.

          • yemmly@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            5 months ago

            Yes the developer sees it, and also the data brokers they sell all their user data to see it, aggregate it, and corollate it. Not to mention whatever Microsoft does with it.

            • yemmly@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              I would be interested in learning what people find objectionable about my comments, if anyone would care to share.

    • joewilliams007@kbin.melroy.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      nu. The people decide in this. We cant keep making new rules for the shit they come up with. I care. Thus i use firefox on linux with an open search. The people are stupid. Thats the problem. They want this comfort, they pay for it.

      • granolabar@kbin.melroy.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Well currently the way legislation works, yea… They would get it turned somehow where user gets fucked even more.

        It aint got to be like that. This comment is more about how pathetically failed the state is more than anything…

        The state can’t regulate the industry lol wtf

        So much capture peasants are ready to go mad max style to survive their corpo owners.