• OneWomanCreamTeam@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    8 months ago

    I mean, this is how far our standard of living has fallen in the US.

    Like, back in the 80’s and 90’s it was pretty normal for a family to subsist on a single income, in a reasonably nice house, with all of their necessities taken care of. It was so normal that even a brainless loser like Homer could do it.

    Also because back then, kinda fat = automatic loser

    • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      Frank Grimes pointed out the insanity/luck of his living situation and your last part is true today “bumbling oaf” is still an archetype

      • Kbin_space_program@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        It has nothing to do with suburbia.

        It has everything to do with the politics of Thatcher and Reagan. Their policies of annihilating unions, human rights and creating tax cuts for the rich by passing on the taxes to the working and the poor created this dystopian reality we now have.

        If we cut out the rich and restore what we used to have for rights and protections, we can try to save ourselves from extinction.

  • xantoxis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    He’s not? There’s literally an episode about how Homer is so lucky in life that he drives a man insane.

  • blind3rdeye@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Isn’t Homer meant to be an illustration of privilege? Like, he’s pretty useless, but still gets essentially everything he wants.

    • Syd@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Nah, it’s supposed to be funny and relatable. Times changed, not the cartoon.