• stellargmite@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 month ago

    Why would we believe the promises of the ones who ruined the primary utility of their core product in the first place, and convinced or blackmailed the rest of the internet to take part in the ruination ? An advertising corporation will tell us to put cyanide on our pizza if it makes them an extra buck this quarter, and google is worse than that. Profit despite the social costs is doing no evil /s

      • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        That was removed as their motto in 2015, following a restructuring of Google as a subsidiary of Alphabet.

        • Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          I said it back then and I’ll say it again: Calling your mega corporation “Alphabet” sounds hella distopian

          • palordrolap@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            The main reason for the name is that it sorts before both Amazon and Apple in the Big Tech directory. It’s literally as petty as that. They obviously chose a word that was related to searching within that criterion, but still.

        • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          It actually wasn’t, I used to think that as well, but they just moved it to a different section of their Code of Conduct, out of the Preface. Part of the reason so many people think it was removed is because of the countless headlines saying it was removed…

          (from the preface)

          They did violate federal labor laws by firing 3 employees who brought forth a lawsuit alleging the clause was a contractual obligation, though. So that sucks.

          • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            It may be in their code of conduct, but that’s not their motto. As of 2015, their motto is “Do the right thing.”

  • paholg@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    The company has taken action against violations of its policies, she said

    What does this mean in this context? Send takedown notices to people who joke on the Internet?

    • chetradley@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      The fucksmith post in question has been removed by moderators, so I wonder if Google really is pressuring Reddit to remove jokes from their platform now. This person had no idea their shit post would be used to train AI over a decade later, and they certainly weren’t violating any policies when they posted it. It’s like nobody involved in this process knew anything about Reddit.

      Pay $60 million to train on bad data.
      Implement AI trained on bad data.
      Panic when the AI returns bad answers.
      Manually remove bad data.
      Profit??

      Edit: it was removed when I checked yesterday, but it looks like they restored it.

      • BigFatNips@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Well I guess the main difference would be that Firefox is a web browser not a search engine lmao. Fuck kagi though, CEO/owner is an antisocial lunatic

  • moitoi@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    AI is the new scam after crypto, nft, etc. The technology isn’t to blame itself. It can have some useful case for sure.

    The real issue is the Market™, the belief in infinite growth. We arrived at the point of no return, where infinite growth is impossible. Humans like to challenge impossible. They will try to find whatever is possible to tackle the impossible. In our case, humans try to create growth artificially with crypto, nft, ai, and all the others. Because, it’s the only way to have a minimalist growth for the shareholders and investors. Billions if not trillions were invested in Google and the others AI companies to milk the last drop for some dividend. Short term dividends should have wrote.

    These bad search results are not to serve the general interest. It’s here to serve these investments and return the last profit possible of the dogma of infinity in a finite world. It does indicate how bad the situation became for the economy. They are the cracks leaking the end of an era. They are symptomatic.

    • Olhonestjim@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      It sounds… impossible to defeat this darker side of human nature, in order to grow into a mature species worthy of restoring and responsibly maintaining this garden planet.

      • demonsword@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        It sounds… impossible to defeat this darker side of human nature

        Capitalist ideology is so hardwired into most of us that it seems easier to accept the end of the world than the end of capitalism itself

      • Starkstruck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I think most humans aren’t like that, it’s just that the ones that are have managed to structure society to reward their behavior. We need to get these vile, greed driven ghouls, out of positions of power to get anywhere.

          • Starkstruck@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Yeah. Like the old adage of whoever seeks power is least deserving of it. It’s a difficult thing to combat.

            • pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              I can’t remember if it was Asimov or Heinlein (maybe Clarke), but one of them said that an elected official should be drug into office kicking and screaming, and only be allowed to leave when they’ve done a good job.

    • NutWrench@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yup. I think this is what always happens when the smart people leave a company and the only people left are “the line must always go up” business idiots who don’t understand what they have or how it works.

  • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    … aren’t representative of most people’s experiences.

    Every AI “answer” I’ve gotten from Google is factually incorrect, often ludicrously so.

  • MataVatnik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I barely use Google now. I’m on Yandex or DuckDuckGo. Yandex is probably the best right now for me.

  • spyd3r@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    They wouldn’t need to ‘improve’ their search experience if they never enshittified the results page like 10 years ago.

  • letsgo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Copilot gives a four step solution then finishes with “glue is not the answer”.